Thursday, April 26, 2007

Come Fly With Me


2008 Candidates Rely on Private Jets

By JIM KUHNHENN
Associated Press Writer
April 26, 2007, 6:44 PM EDT

WASHINGTON -- A flock of small jets took flight from Washington Thursday, each carrying a Democratic presidential candidate to South Carolina for the first debate of the political season. For Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama, Chris Dodd and Joe Biden, it was wheels up shortly after they voted in favor of legislation requiring that U.S. troops begin returning home from Iraq in the fall.


No one jet pooled, no one took commercial flights to save money, fuel or emissions.

Monday, April 23, 2007

More Nonsense from the Global Warming Left


Crow calls for limit on loo paper

"I propose a limitation be put on how many squares of toilet paper can be used in any one sitting."

- Sheryl Crow

Singer Sheryl Crow has said a ban on using too much toilet paper should be introduced to help the environment.

Crow has suggested using "only one square per restroom visit, except, of course, on those pesky occasions where two to three could be required".

The 45-year-old, who made the comments on her website, has just toured the US on a biodiesel-powered bus to raise awareness about climate change. She teamed up with environmental activist Laurie David for the shows. The pair targeted 11 university campuses to persuade students to help combat the world's environmental problems.

"I have spent the better part of this tour trying to come up with easy ways for us all to become a part of the solution to global warming," Crow wrote. "Although my ideas are in the earliest stages of development, they are, in my mind, worth investigating.


Laurie David's husband, Seinfeld creator Larry David, also appeared. Crow has also commented on her website about how she thinks paper napkins "represent the height of wastefulness". She has designed a clothing line with what she calls a "dining sleeve". The sleeve is detachable and can be replaced with another "dining sleeve" after the diner has used it to wipe his or her mouth.

The shows involved a short set by the singer, a talk by David and segments of Al Gore's environmental film An Inconvenient Truth.



Toilet paper and paper napkins: the left's version of weapons of mass destruction.

Friday, April 20, 2007

Thursday, April 19, 2007

If It Bleeds ...



Backlash Leads to Pullback on Cho Video

Apr 19 02:31 PM US/Eastern

By DAVID BAUDER

AP Television Writer



NEW YORK (AP) - With a backlash developing against the media for airing sickening pictures from Virginia Tech shooter Cho Seung-Hui, Fox News Channel said Thursday it would stop and other networks said they would severely limit their use.


NBC News was the recipient Wednesday of Cho's package of rambling, hate-filled video and written messages, with several pictures of him posing with a gun. Contents began airing on "Nightly News," and its rivals quickly used them, too.


Family members of victims canceled plans to appear on NBC's "Today" show Thursday because they "were very upset" with the network for showing the pictures, "Today" host Meredith Vieira said.


Virginia State Police Col. Steve Flaherty—who praised NBC Wednesday for coming to authorities first with the package—said Thursday he was disappointed with what the network showed. "I just hate that a lot of people not used to seeing that type of image had to see it," he said.


NBC said the material was aired because it helped to answer the question of why Cho killed 32 people and himself on the Virginia Tech campus Monday. "The decision to run this video was reached by virtually every news organization in the world, as evidenced by coverage on television, on Web sites and in newspapers," NBC said in a statement. "We have covered this story—and our unique role in it—with extreme sensitivity, underscored by our devoted efforts to remember and honor the victims and heroes of this tragic incident."




How did NBC "honor the victims and heroes of this tragic incident" by broadcasting mass murderer Cho Seung-Hui's deranged rantings to the whole world? The truth is that the news media in general and NBC in particular victimized the survivors and the families of the slain all over again.

"I Feel Pretty"

Edwards Reimbuses Campaign for Haircuts

Apr 19 11:33 AM US/Eastern
By NEDRA PICKLER
Associated Press Writer


WASHINGTON (AP) - Democrat John Edwards is trying to get out of a hairy situation, reimbursing his presidential campaign $800 for two visits with a Beverly Hills stylist.

Two $400 cuts by stylist Joseph Torrenueva, who told The Associated Press that the former North Carolina senator is a longtime client, showed up on Edwards' campaign spending reports filed this weekend. Edwards spokesman Eric Schultz said it never should have been there. "The bill was sent to the campaign. It was inadvertently paid," Schultz said. "John Edwards will be reimbursing the campaign."

Edwards is also the subject of a popular YouTube spoof poking fun at his youthful good looks. The video shows the candidate combing his tresses to the dubbed-in tune of "I Feel Pretty."

Federal Election Commission records show Edwards' campaign also spent $250 in services from Designworks Salon in Dubuque, Iowa, and $225 in services from the Pink Sapphire in Manchester, N.H. Schultz said those services were legitimate campaign expenditures to prepare Edwards for media appearances.

Political candidates often have hair and makeup done before media appearances. Edwards rival Hillary Rodham Clinton got some attention last year when her campaign paid $2,500 for two hairstyling sessions that the campaign classified as media production expenses.

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Gore Heckled, Jeered in Canada

Sebastien Cadieux & Brian Hastien
The Brock Report

MONTREAL (CUP) - Concordia president Claude Lajeunesse was booed as he took the stage to give Al Gore an honorary doctorate from the university on March 22.

The brainchild of Concordia Student Union president Khaleed Juma, the doctorate was presented while the crowd, present to listen to speeches from Gore and David Suzuki, filed out the exits after the question and answer period with Gore was cancelled.

The talk took place in the cadre of Less Talk, More Action: A Youth Action Summit on Climate Change, organized by Youth Action Montreal members and Concordia University students Peter Schiefke and Mohamed Shuriye.

Gore and Suzuki's message was clear: The world is in imminent danger if we continue our current habits and don't change towards a more eco-friendly society.The former U.S. vice-president's speech was effectively his Academy Award-winning documentary An Inconvenient Truth with updated statistics, and presented by an angrier, fist-shaking Gore.


His presentation was halted at least twice as opponents to his agenda began to shout out.They called him a liar and a villain, and screamed, "What about your swimming pools?" in regards to recent allegations that the monthly electricity bill of Gore's estate rivalled a year's bill for the average American home.




That Was Then and This is Now

THEN


Neville Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler in 1938

"We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by analyzing possible causes, by trying to remove them, by discussion in a spirit of collaboration and good will. I cannot believe that such a program would be rejected by the people of this country, even if it does mean the establishment of personal contact with the dictators."
-- Neville Chamberlain (March 18, 1869-November 9, 1940)


NOW

Nancy Pelosi and Bashar Assad in 2007

"We came in friendship, hope, and determined that the road to Damascus is a road to peace."

--Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, after meeting with Syrian President Bashar Assad.


Saturday, March 31, 2007

And You Thought Al Gore Was a Hypocrite



"It [global warming] is a very valid issue. I'm wondering if we need to think about other planets and dome cities. Everyone can do their bit. But I don't know if it's not too late already. We have to think about alternative methods of fuel. "

-- Actor John Travolta, 53, owner of five private planes – a customized Boeing 707, three Gulfstream jets and a Lear jet


John Travolta's home in Florida: Jet planes parked in the back and SUVs parked up front.

"Carbon credits" or "carbon offsets" are a hoot. They allow liberal hypocrites like Al Gore and John Travolta not to change their luxurious lifestyles and still claim to be "carbon-neutral." All they have to do is pay a monthly fee to any of a number of companies, including the one Gore owns, Generation Investment Management LLP, to buy "carbon offsets."


Carbon offsets work like the indulgences sold in the later middle ages. According to EcoBusiness Links (http://www.ecobusinesslinks.com/carbon_offset_wind_credits_carbon_reduction.htm ), "[c]arbon offsets enable individuals and businesses to reduce the CO2 emissions they are responsible for by offsetting, reducing or displacing the CO2 in another place, typically where it is more economical to do so."

They can pay as little as $3.56 or as much as $39.48 per metric ton of CO2. All they have to do is calculate their carbon footprint (available from a number of websites. Just google the term), contact the company of their choice depending on the type of offset they desire and write those monthly checks. Their carbon offset provider will take care of the rest for them.

It is really hassle- and guilt-free. As a bonus, they can go on living the way they are living - fuel-guzzling planes and energy inefficient mansions are ok -while safe in the knowledge that their CO2 emissions are being "offset" somewhere else. Hopefully.

Their now guilt-free consciences will allow them to self-righteously preach to others about the importance of public transportation, the need to live under domes or the urgency to move to other planets.

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Payola II




Hil to Clear 400G Debt of Iowa Pol Who Backed Her

BY RICHARD SISK in Washington and HELEN KENNEDY in New York DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITERS
Wednesday, March 28th 2007, 4:00 AM

Sen. Hillary Clinton has agreed to help former Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack, who endorsed her Monday, pay off his $400,000 campaign debt. Clinton (D-N.Y.) will put the arm on her donor network for Vilsack, who quit the presidential race Feb. 23 citing financial difficulties.



Clinton spokesman Phil Singer said it was a normal gesture to make and called suggestions of any endorsement quid pro quo "ridiculous."
"One thing's got absolutely nothing to do with the other," he said. "They've known each other for years. If she weren't running for President, she'd be doing whatever she can to help retire his debt."


Three weeks ago, Vilsack said his main focus was closing down his campaign debt and that he would not make an endorsement until the end of the year - if then. "I think the chances are good that I'll do that, but I don't know that for certain," he said.


Clinton has already run into problems with the appearance
of buying endorsements.Right after she scored the politically important backing of South Carolina pastor and state Sen. Darrell Jackson, it emerged she had also hired him as a $10,000-a-month consultant. Rival Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) had offered him half that.


It's an old political pitfall. In 2004, Democrat Howard Dean was accused of "buying" the endorsement of Carol Moseley Braun by giving her a $20,000-a-month travel budget.

Enough Said


Edwards Experiences Surge in Support


By MIKE BAKER, Associated Press Writer Wed Mar 28, 5:52 PM ET

RALEIGH, N.C. - Elizabeth Edwards' sobering diagnosis of incurable cancer has triggered an outpouring of support, with a surge of donations to her husband's presidential campaign and affirmation of his candidacy in opinion polls.
The amount of money given to Edwards' campaign via the Internet increased by about 50 percent since the couple announced last week that Elizabeth Edwards' cancer had returned. A CBS News poll released Wednesday found
that by a 2-to-1 margin, voters support Edwards' decision to continue his campaign.

Payola I


Bush Demands Clean War Funding Bill

By DAVID ESPO, AP Special
Correspondent Wed Mar 28, 8:31 PM ET



WASHINGTON - President Bush and the Democratic-controlled Congress lurched toward a veto showdown over Iraq on Wednesday, the commander in chief demanding a replenishment of war funding with no strings and Speaker Nancy Pelosi counseling him, "Calm down with the threats."

Bush said imposition of a "specific and random date of withdrawal would be disastrous" for U.S. troops in Iraq and he predicted that lawmakers would take the blame if the money ran short."The clock is ticking for our troops in the field," he said. "If Congress fails to pass a bill to fund our troops on the front lines, the American people will know who to hold responsible."

Bush spoke as the Senate moved toward passage of legislation that would require the beginning of a troop withdrawal within 120 days, and would set a goal of March 31, 2008, for its completion.

The House approved a more sweeping measure last week, including a mandatory withdrawal deadline for nearly all combat troops of Sept. 1, 2008. Both bills would provide more than $90 billion to sustain military efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan
.

After passage, the next step would be a House-Senate compromise measure almost certain to include conditions that Bush has said he finds objectionable, and the president's remarks seemed designed to lay the political groundwork for a veto showdown with the new Democratic majority later this spring.

Confidently predicting his veto would be sustained in Congress, he said, "Funding for our forces in Iraq will begin to run out in mid-April. Members of Congress need to stop making political statements, and start providing vital funds for our troops. They need to get that bill to my desk so I can sign it into law."

One key Democrat with longtime ties to the Pentagon, Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., said Bush was exaggerating, and he estimated the real deadline for a fresh infusion of funds was June 1. Gordon Adams, a former Clinton administration official specializing in defense issues, said the Pentagon has authority to transfer existing funds between accounts. "So into June, while it's painful, it's possible" for the military to maintain operations, he said.

Democratic leaders, determined to force Bush to change course in Iraq, also disputed his contention that Congress would be to blame for any funding difficulties in a war they have vowed to end. "Why doesn't he get real with what's going on with the world?" said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. "We're not holding up funding in Iraq and he knows that. Why doesn't he deal with the real issues facing the American people?"

Pelosi responded to Bush with a blend of conciliation and challenge. "On this very important matter, I would extend a hand of friendship to the president, just to say to him, 'Calm down with the threats," she said. "There's a new Congress in town. We accept your constitutional role. We want you to accept ours."

Democrats took control of Congress in January after elections framed by voter dissatisfaction over a war that has now claimed the lives of more than 3,200 U.S. troops and cost more than $350 billion. "This war must end. The American people have lost faith in the president's conduct of the war. Let's see how we can work together," added Pelosi, D-Calif. She and Reid also sent Bush a letter during the day that said they "stand ready to work with you, but your threats to veto a bill that has not even been presented to you indicate that you may not be ready to work with us."

Whatever the outcome, the confrontation bore similarities to a veto fight of a dozen years ago. At the time, a new, Republican-controlled Congress promised steep spending cutbacks to balance the budget, and a politically weakened president of the other party refused to go along. A pair of government shutdowns ensued — including one that lasted 21 days — and Republicans bore the brunt of the public's unhappiness. In the end, the new GOP majority surrendered, and Bill Clinton exploited the episode to help rehabilitate his standing with the voters.

Apart from the Iraq provisions, the Senate legislation includes about $20 billion in domestic spending that Bush did not ask for. Republicans readied an attempt to strip out much of it, and Bush listed it as among the bill's objectionable features. "Here's the bottom line: The House and Senate bills have too much pork," he said. He got a laugh at lawmakers' expense when he said $3.5 million was included "for visitors to tour the Capitol and see for themselves how Congress works." The funds are for a new underground Capitol visitor center, over-budget and still incomplete years after its initial target date.


The Surrender to Al-Qaida bill the Democrats passed had to be laden with pork. Bribery is their way of "rewarding" those who vote to cut, run and surrender in Iraq.

Pelosi and Reid are quaking in their boots. If they were serious about the issue, they would have presented a clean bill for an up or down vote.

Truth be told, this bill is about presidential politics. Dems want to campaign for the presidency without Iraq on the background and by taking credit for surrendering to terrorism.








Wednesday, March 21, 2007

1984/2008?

Hllary's Amerika



(03/20/2007) CODEPINK's Desiree Fairooz interrupts Hillary Clinton Fundraiser with the "Why, Why, Hillary Why?" song to the tune of "American Pie" as another CODEPINK protester Jodie Evans gets dragged out by 3-4 secret service officers.



CODEPINK: Women for Peace is a vibrant women-led grassroots peace and social justice movement that strives for positive social change through creative protest, non-violent direct action, and community involvement. Rejecting the Bush administration's fear-based security alerts, CODEPINK is a spirited call to "wage peace."
-- Code Pink: Women for Peace on the site of Global Exchange. Accessed 21 March 2007.



Aren't these people supposed to be on Hillary's side? Has she so alienated the rabid, fringe left in her blind quest for power that they are now resorting to heckling her? Besides, how does one "wage peace?" How would the liberal CODEPINK gals make nice with Osama bin Laden?

By the way, is Hillary standing on a catwalk?


Monday, March 19, 2007

Clueless or Disingenuous?

From tonight's Rochester Post-Bulletin:


Lawmakers discuss education, taxes
3/19/2007 11:08:11 AM
By Jeff Kiger
The Post-Bulletin
Education was the topic on the table, but money and taxes often overshadowed it
during a legislative forum Saturday. Alice Seagren, commissioner of the state Department of Education, spoke at the Rochester Area Chmber of Commerce's
Eggs and Issues breakfast with area legislators. State Reps. Kim Norton, Randy Demmer and Andy Welti and state Sen. Dave Senjem participated. Rep. Tina
Liebling had to leave before the dicussion began, and Sen. Ann Lynch was absent
for family reasons.

"The T-Word," as Senjem called it, came up during discussion of the tax plans announced Friday by House and Senate leaders. Lawmakers have proposed using additional state revenue to offset increased classroom spending and property tax buydowns for homeowners. A new 9 percent tax bracket would apply to married people with incomes of more than $400,000, $226,000 for single filers, after deductions. House analysts estimate the proposal would affect about 50,000 people and generate $433 million over two years.

And how did our area legislators respond to the DFL's confiscatory tax plan?

Not surprinsingly, Republicans are unequivocal in their opposition to the Minnesota DFL's abusive tax increases.






"I have not supported this in the past, and I won't now. I think moderation will prevail."



-- Dave Senjem, (R) Senate District 30
















"Yes, the people with high wages can afford it, ... and they can afford to move to Florida, too."

-- Randy Demmer, (R) House District 29A






DFL legislators were harder to pin down, however.



"It is very targeted. I have not yet decided if I will support. I'll be doing a lot of thinking. Right now I have not made up my mind."

-- Kim Norton, (D) House District 29B




"I've advocated moderation. I have not decided if I support this."

-- Andy Welti, (D) House District 30B






Leave it to democrat legislators to say nothing when asked directly if they will support the abusive taxes proposed by the DFL. At the end of the day, both will vote as their party leaders tell them to vote not in the best economic interest of Olmsted County taxpayers who elected them. I have said it before and I will say it again: Olmsted County DFLers are Dr. Jekyll while in town but quickly turn into Mr. Hyde when in St. Paul.

Norton's non-answer is particularly telling. At first she appears to defend her party's repulsive tax increases by saying they are "very targeted." But quickly, in true doublespeak, says she has not yet made up her mind. Translation: "I have not yet received my marching orders." In her defense, I must say that she probably didn't anticipate the question or else she would have had a scripted answer as is her custom. Norton does not say "Good morning" unless she has a cue card with the words clearly printed on it.

Why not be honest about their suport for abusive taxation from the start? Because Norton and Welti are DFLers, that's why.

Saturday, March 17, 2007

"More Politics Than Science"

Here's some ammunition for those global warming skeptics out there who can't find an alternate view to the dogmatic global climate change hysteria. Unlike Al Gore, Bjarne Andresen knows what he is talking about and does not benefit financially from global warming paranoia. Andresen is a physics professor at the University of Copenhagen whose research focus is statistical optimization, modeling, atomic physics and finite-time thermodynamics. The debate is far from over.

Public release date: 15-Mar-2007
Available at http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-03/uoc-gt-031507.php
Contact: Gertie Skaarup skaarup@nbi.dk
45-3532-5320
University of Copenhagen


GLOBAL TEMPERATURE -- Politics or Science?


The entire debate about global warming is a mirage. The concept of ‘global temperature’ is thermodynamically as well as mathematically an impossibility, says professor at The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Bjarne Andresen who has analyzed this hot topic in collaboration with professors Christopher Essex from University of Western Ontario and Ross McKitrick from University of Guelph, both Ontario, Canada.


It is generally assumed that the atmosphere and the oceans have grown warmer during the recent 50 years. The reason for this point of view is an upward trend in the curve of measurements of the so-called ‘global temperature’. This is the temperature obtained by collecting measurements of air temperatures at a large number of measuring stations around the Globe, weighing them according to the area they represent, and then calculating the yearly average according to the usual method of adding all values and dividing by the number of points.


Average Without Meaning


"It is impossible to talk about a single temperature for something as complicated as the climate of Earth", Bjarne Andresen says, an an expert of thermodynamics. "A temperature can be defined only for a homogeneous system. Furthermore, the climate is not governed by a single temperature. Rather, differences of temperatures drive the processes and create the storms, sea currents, thunder, etc. which make up the climate".


He explains that while it is possible to treat temperature statistically locally, it is meaningless to talk about a a global temperature for Earth. The Globe consists of a huge number of components which one cannot just add up and average. That would correspond to calculating the average phone number in the phone book. That is meaningless. Or talking about economics, it does make sense to compare the currency exchange rate of two countries, whereas there is no point in talking about an average ‘global exchange rate’.


If temperature decreases at one point and it increases at another, the average will remain the same as before, but it will give rise to an entirely different thermodynamics and thus a different climate. If, e.g. it is 10 degrees at one point and 40 degrees at another, the average is 25 degrees. But if instead there is 25 degrees both places, the average is still 25 degrees. These two cases would give rise to two entirely different types of climate, because in the former case one would have pressure differences and strong winds, while in the latter there would be no wind.


Many Averages

A further problem with the extensive use of ‘the global temperature’ is that there are many ways of calculating average temperatures.


Example 1: Take two equally large glasses of water. The water in one glass is 0 degrees, in the other it is 100 degrees. Adding these two numbers and dividing by two yields an average temperature of 50 degrees. That is called the arithmetic average.


Example 2: Take the same two glasses of water at 0 degrees and 100 degrees, respectively. Now multiply those two numbers and take the square root, and you will arrive at an average temperature of 46 degrees. This is called the geometric average. (The calculation is done in degrees Kelvin which are then converted back to degrees Celsius.)


The difference of 4 degrees is the energy which drives all the thermodynamic processes which create storms, thunder, sea currents, etc.


More Politics Than Science


These are but two examples of ways to calculate averages. They are all equally correct, but one needs a solid physical reason to choose one above another. Depending on the averaging method used, the same set of measured data can simultaneously show an upward trend and a downward trend in average temperature. Thus claims of disaster may be a on sequence of which averaging method has been used, the researchers point out.


What Bjarne Andresen and his coworkers emphasize is that physical arguments are needed to decide whether one averaging method or another is needed to calculate an average which is relevant to describe the state of Earth, not tradition.


The currently used method and the consequences drawn from it therefore is more politics than science, they explain.
###
C. Essex, R. McKitrick, B. Andresen: Does a Global Temperature Exist?; J. Non-Equil. Thermod. vol. 32, p. 1-27 (2007). [= Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics]
For further information contact:
Bjarne Andresen, professor of physics Phone: +45 3532-0470


e-mail: Andresen@fys.ku.dk

Friday, March 16, 2007

Democrat Hypocrisy on Iraq

Love, Democrat Style

Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) slipped in a compliment — of sorts — about a fellow 2008 hopeful during his appearances on the Iowa stump last weekend.“I want to wait and hear what John Edwards has to say, he’s kind of good-looking,”



During an appearance in West Burlington, Iowa, the phrase appeared again, this time with Edwards as “kind of cute.”



Now, that's how Democrats campaign. Why can't Hillary say nice things about her rivals as well?











Thursday, March 15, 2007

Political Schizophrenia


At the risk of offending Minnesota liberals for blaspheming against of one of their most revered deities, First District Congressman Tim Walz is fit to be tied.


According to the Rochester Post-Bulletin, the freshman congressman is "demanding that the Department of Defense explain why it might reclassify [Kosovo] as not being a hazardous duty zone."


Maybe Kosovo is not Iraq or Afghanistan, Congressman, where roadside bombs and homicide bombers take lives every day. Walz and his fellow Democrats want to cut and run in Iraq, where America is fighting an active war.


Why not cut and run in Kosovo as well? Why not bring those troops home?

Climate Change Zealotry

I didnt' think they were going to do it, but the Rochester Post-Bulletin published my letter to the editor tonight. Here it is in case you missed it.



Hypocrisy in climate dogma

Global warming, like abortion, has taken the form of religious dogma. So much so that "progressives" closed-mindedly argue that it is an established fact and further debate is neither welcome nor tolerated.

Columnist Ellen Goodman has gone so far as to equate global warming skeptics to Holocaust deniers in a recent op-ed. No hyperbole here.



The monthly energy consumption of pseudo-climatologist Al Gore's mansion in Tennessee is 20 times the yearly average of a typical American home. Nevertheless, the former vice president self-righteously urges everyone else to buy energy-efficient light bulbs and ride electric lawnmowers to work to save the planet from energy hogs like, well, Al Gore. He buys "carbon offsets" from his own company, Generation Investment Management LLP, a form of indulgence meant to assuage guilty consciences for oversized carbon footprints. No hypocrisy there.


Climate change zealotry is only the tip of the melting iceberg when it comes to manufacturing crises to justify government intrusion. An insatiable desire to micromanage people's lives has resulted in bans of unhealthy, though legal, behaviors in one's own place of business and arbitrary limitations in the number of garage sales city residents are now "allowed" to have.

Incidentally, since I do not plan to sell any of my junk this year, I am now in the "garage sale offsets" business.

Othelmo da Silva
Rochester

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Come Again?




Clinton Sees Some Troops Staying in Iraq if She Is Elected



WASHINGTON, March 14 — Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton foresees a “remaining military as well as political mission” in Iraq, and says that if elected president, she would keep a reduced but significant military force there to fight Al Qaeda, deter Iranian aggression, protect the Kurds and possibly support the Iraqi military.


In a half-hour interview on Tuesday in her Senate office, Mrs. Clinton said the scaled-down American military force that she would maintain in Iraq after taking office would stay off the streets in Baghdad and would no longer try to protect Iraqis from sectarian violence — even if it descended into ethnic
cleansing.




Excuse me, I know people are not supposed to hold Hillary accountable to anything she said before the latest interview, but did she not say a few weeks ago she would "end the war" if elected president?
Ah, yes, I remember now. At the Democratic National Committee Winter Meeting in Washington, D.C. on February 2, 2007, Mrs. Clinton bellowed:



"If we in Congress don't end this war before January 2009, as president, I will."

Excuse me, but didn't Bill Clinton's wife actually vote FOR the Iraq war?
Or maybe Mrs. Rodham Clinton voted AGAINST the war before she voted FOR it.
Wait, I think I'm getting Democrat double talkers mixed up here.






Monday, March 12, 2007

"Cool It, Gore!," Real Climatologists Say

“I don’t want to pick on Al Gore, but there are a lot of inaccuracies in the statements we are seeing, and we have to temper that with real data.”

-- Don J. Easterbrook, emeritus professor of geology at Western Washington University at the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America

Uneasy about the backlash against global warming hysteria, real climatologists fear Gore has gone "beyond the scientific evidence," according to this New York Times story.

Still, there are plenty of left wing bloggers out there soliciting signatures on petitions to "draft Gore." My take is that Gore won't run because he is making too much money selling "carbon emission offsets" to bother campaigning for his party's nomination for president.

Yes, it is in Gore's economic self-interest to promote the global climate change scam since he owns Generation Investment Management LLP, one of a host of companies that sell "carbon emission offsets."

According to EcoBusinessLinks, a self-billed environmental directory, "carbon offsets enable individuals and businesses to reduce the CO2 emissions they are responsible for by offsetting, reducing or displacing the CO2 in another place, typically where it is more economical to do so." A quick perusal of the website tells you that "Carbon Neutral" Gore is not the only one taking advantage of liberals' misplaced guilt for driving Escalades and flying GulfStream jets.

For a good laugh, check out the site's price survey table, where they claim that "for a very small amount of money you can drive the equivalent of a zero-CO2-emission car!"

Like con-man Joseph Bessimer, not P.T. Barnum as widely believed, once said, "There's a sucker born every minute..." And they are buying "carbon offsets."

Saturday, March 10, 2007

Alive and Kicking

The Olmsted County Convention held today was one of the most exciting and dynamic ever. Some highlights ...

Fran Bradley did a superb job as Convention Chair. We moved along at a fast clip. Business was well conducted.

Tom Ostrom brought the house down with his John Edwards impression and a biting exposé of the ridiculous legislation the DFL is ramming down our throats this session. Ostrom's "glass warfare" line, a reference to Andy Welti's ban on glass containers, was particularly memorable.


Senator Norm Coleman delivers a stump speech like no one else in Minnesota.

Carla Nelson announced she will not be seeking the party's nomination for District 30A. What a pity! Democrat Rep. Tina Liebling is an embarrassment to the district and to the town.

More importantly, District 29A Rep. Randy Demmer (R-Hayfield) announced he will seek the party's nomination for the First District Congressional seat now occupied by Democrat Tim Walz. Demmer will compete for the nomination with former State Senate Minority Leader Dick Day (R-Owatonna) .

It should be an exciting race. Walz is doing his best to keep in front of the cameras whenever he can. The Rochester Post-Bulletin is happy to comply. Congressman Walz has been on both sides of the track when it comes to the DM&E. He rejoices when the federal loan is rejected but expresses hope the railroad can get the money elsewhere. Speaking out of both sides of his mouth like a good little democrat.

Yours truly was elected PR co-chair. It's going to be fun.

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

A Little Perspective

Lest we or our liberal foes forget:

ARKANSAS ALZHEIMER'S*

- Number of times Hillary Clinton said "I don't recall" or its equivalent in a statement to a House investigating committee: 50

- Number of paragraphs in this statement: 42

- Number of times Bill Clinton said "I don't recall" or its equivalent in the released portions of the his testimony on Paula Jones: 271

- Total number of facts or events not recalled before official bodies by Bill Kennedy, Harold Ickes, Ricki Seidman, Bruce Lindsey, Bill Burton, Mark Gearan, Mack McLarty, Neil Eggleston, John Podesta, Jennifer O'Connor, Dwight Holton, Patsy Thomasson, Jeff Eller, Beth Nolan, Cliff Sloan, Bernard Nussbaum, George Stephanopoulous, Roy Neel, Rahm Emanuel, Maggie Williams, David Tarbell, Susan Thomases, Webster Hubbell, Roger Altman, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton: 6,125

- Average occurrence of memory lapse by top [Clinton] administration figures while before official bodies: 235

* From "Clinton Scandal Stats," available at http://emporium.turnpike.net/P/ProRev/wwstats.htm




It's too bad Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald (pictured above) wasn't in charge of prosecuting real crimes such as the ones perpetrated during the Clinton administration.

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Ham Sandwich









"A grand jury would indict a ham sandwich."
-- Sol Wachtler, disbarred former Chief Judge of New York State

Saturday, March 03, 2007

Alive and Well

Just in case you are wondering, conservative principles are alive and well as evidenced by Vice-president Dick Cheney's speech to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) last Thursday night in Washington, D.C., excerpts of which follow.

As you might have heard, I've just been out of the country -- which, in some quarters, is considered a good thing. I got back yesterday morning after more than a week overseas, on a trip that took me to several countries. In Japan and Australia I had very good discussions with leaders of two of our great allies -- Prime Minister Abe in Japan, and Prime Minister John Howard in Australia. And on the last part of the trip I visited Pakistan and Afghanistan to review progress in the war on terror with Presidents Musharraf and Karzai.

On the journey I also spent time, as I always try to do, with members of the American Armed Forces -- on the deck of the carrier USS Kitty Hawk in Tokyo Bay, at Andersen Air Force Base on Guam, and at Bagram Air Force Base in Afghanistan. I think it's important to remind the troops that we believe in them, we believe in what they're doing, and we're going to back them one hundred percent.


With a divided government and strong feelings on both sides of the aisle, getting things done is a bit more of a challenge than it was before. But the American people expect results, and the President and I are committed to working with Congress for the good of the country. What we will not do is abandon the conservative principles we ran on in 2000 and 2004. President Bush's policies have revived this nation's economy, improved the quality of the federal courts, and protected the American people from great dangers. None of these outcomes came about by accident. We've worked hard for the prosperity and the security of the American people, and we have no intention of letting it slip away.

As conservatives, we believe, as Ronald Reagan did, that government should "work with us, not over us; to stand by our side, not ride on our back. Government," said President Reagan, "can and must provide opportunity, not smother it; foster productivity, not stifle it." That wisdom is the key to creating a healthy, growing economy -- and by most any measure, that is what we have today. America has now seen five years of uninterrupted economic growth -- in a recovery that has generated nearly 7.5 million new jobs. When people across the world look at America's economy they see low inflation, low unemployment, and the fastest growth of any major industrialized nation. Wages are rising, too -- allowing American families to meet their budgets and build a better future.

We recognize that nobody can sit in an office in Washington, D.C. and decide to make America prosperous. Our job is to preserve the freedoms that gave birth to this nation, to encourage free enterprise, and to give people confidence that their hard work will be rewarded, not punished. And that begins with leaving more money in the hands of those who earn it.

For that reason, at the start of our administration, President Bush asked Congress to pass significant, broad-based tax relief. The House and Senate responded with historic pro-growth legislation. We reduced taxes for every American who pays income taxes. We doubled the child tax credit, reduced the marriage penalty. And in 2003, we accelerated the rate reductions; we created new incentives for small businesses to invest. And in order to lower the cost of capital, and to encourage firms to expand and hire new workers, we reduced the tax rate on capital gains and dividends.

Now the evidence is coming in -- and the Bush tax relief has proven to be exactly the right policy for our country. If you think of all that's happened in the last six years -- the recession we inherited, terrorist attacks, corporate scandals, natural disasters, a tripling in the price of oil -- it's remarkable how resilient this economy has been. In
fact, since 2001, our GDP has grown by 16 percent. Let me just put it in perspective: In only six years' time, the American economy has expanded by an amount greater than the entire economy of Canada.


All told, federal tax receipts have gone up by more than $520 billion in the last two fiscal years. That's the largest two-year increase in history. By now it's time for even the skeptics to admit that a lower federal tax burden is a powerful driver of investment, growth, and new jobs for America's workers. And that increased economic activity, in turn, generates revenue for the federal government.

On the revenue side, we're going to keep working on a low-tax policy that promotes growth and keeps government within its proper limits. Under present law, many of the Bush tax cuts are still set to expire over the next few years. We feel strongly that Congress should make all the tax cuts permanent -- and that includes ending the federal death tax.

I know we've got some Democrats with big ideas for taxes they want to raise. They ought to realize that no nation has ever taxed its way to prosperity. And if they try that, they're going to find out what the rest of America already knows -- that President Bush is a man of principle and a man of his word.

One of the reasons health care is so expensive today is that the tax code penalizes Americans who are not covered at work, and subsidizes people who choose the most expensive plans. So the President is asking Congress to pass tax reform legislation tohelp make private insurance more affordable and accessible. We're proposing a standard deduction for every worker who has private health insurance, no matter where they get it. Under the President's plan, more than 100 million Americans now covered by employer-provided insurance would actually have lower tax bills.

This reform would also level the playing field, so those who buy health insurance on their own get the same tax advantage as those who get health insurance through their jobs. This would be a positive step toward covering millions in our country who aren't covered at work and struggle to afford it on their own. We believe changing the tax code is absolutely necessary to getting private coverage to more Americans, and to getting a handle on the rising costs of health care, without government trying to run the system.

Finally, as someone who has the honor of working beside the President every day at the White House, I can assure you that he will never relent in his number one obligation as President: to protect the freedom and security of the American people.

The fact that we've defeated all attempts to strike the United States again for the last five and a half years does not mean that we won't be hit in the future. But the record is testimony not just to good luck, but rather to urgent, competent action by a lot of very skilled men and women, and a lot of important decisions by the President. We've improved our security arrangements, reorganized our intelligence capabilities, found ways to surveill and to interrogate the enemy, and worked closely with friends and allies across the world.

In Iraq, our goal remains a democratic nation that upholds the rule of law, respects the rights of its people, provides them security, and is an ally in the war on terror. But for this to happen, Baghdad must be secured. To that end, we're pursuing a new strategy that brings in reinforcements to help Iraqi forces secure the capital. As we meet tonight, Iraqi and coalition forces are at work in the nine sectors of Baghdad, carrying out joint operations to track down terrorists, insurgents, criminals, and the roaming death squads that have tormented people in that city. It's a toughenterprise -- and it's absolutely essential to moving that nation forward, turning the political process toward reconciliation, and completing our mission in Iraq.

Recently, the United States Senate, by unanimous vote, confirmed a superb officer to lead the new strategy in Iraq -- Army General David Petraeus. At a hearing of the Armed Services Committee, General Petraeus was asked flat-out if he could do his job without the troop reinforcements that have been requested by the President. He said no. Yet some of the very Senators who voted to send him to the Iraqi theater tried to pass a resolution opposing the reinforcements. And the House of Representatives, of course, did pass such a resolution. The House resolution was nonbinding -- just a statement expressing the views of the members. But the fact is that every statement we make has multiple audiences. The American people listen. Our soldiers, airmen, and Marines listen. The enemy listens, and so do the Iraqi people. Friendly governments pay attention, and hostile governments take note as well. And they all wonder about America's commitment to this cause.

Very soon both Houses of Congress will have to vote on a piece of legislation that is binding -- a bill to provide emergency funding for the troops. And I sincerely hope the discussion this time will be about winning in Iraq, not about posturing on Capitol Hill. Anyone can say they support the troops, and we should take them at their word. But the proof will come when it's time to provide the money and the support. We expect the House and Senate to meet those needs on time, and in full.

Before I leave you, ladies and gentlemen, I want to thank you again for your commitment -- not just to the principles we share, but to the ideal of active citizenship. In the audience tonight we have entrepreneurs, engineers, doctors, writers, and educators. All of you lead busy lives and have many responsibilities of your own. And yet you make the time, here and in your communities, to get involved in the political process and to make your voices heard. Your efforts make a difference. You give strength to our democracy. And the success of CPAC, year after year, is another indicator that conservatism remains the leading intellectual and political movement in the United States. That's something all of us can be proud of, and it's a credit to each and every one of you. I am deeply grateful to you, and it's been an honor to be in your company tonight.

Paleocon Strikes!

Monday, February 26, 2007

A Convenient Hypocrisy


TENNESSEE CENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH http://www.tennesseepolicy.org/main/article.php?article_id=367

For Immediate Release: February 26, 2007

February 26, 2007

For Further Information, Contact:
Nicole Williams, (615) 383-6431
editor@tennesseepolicy.org

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Al Gore’s Personal Energy Use Is His Own “Inconvenient Truth”

Gore’s home uses more than 20 times the national average

Last night, Al Gore’s global-warming documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, collected an Oscar for best documentary feature, but the Tennessee Center for Policy Research has found that Gore deserves a gold statue for hypocrisy.

Gore’s mansion, located in the posh Belle Meade area of Nashville, consumes more electricity every month than the average American household uses in an entire year, according to the Nashville Electric Service (NES).

In his documentary, the former Vice President calls on Americans to conserve energy by reducing electricity consumption at home.

The average household in America consumes 10,656 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year, according to the Department of Energy. In 2006, Gore devoured nearly 221,000 kWh—more than 20 times the national average.

Last August alone, Gore burned through 22,619 kWh—guzzling more than twice the electricity in one month than an average American family uses in an entire year. As a result of his energy consumption, Gore’s average monthly electric bill topped $1,359.

Since the release of An Inconvenient Truth, Gore’s energy consumption has increased from an average of 16,200 kWh per month in 2005, to 18,400 kWh per month in 2006.

Gore’s extravagant energy use does not stop at his electric bill. Natural gas bills for Gore’s mansion and guest house averaged $1,080 per month last year.

“As the spokesman of choice for the global warming movement, Al Gore has to be willing to walk the walk, not just talk the talk, when it comes to home energy use,” said Tennessee Center for Policy Research President Drew Johnson.

In total, Gore paid nearly $30,000 in combined electricity and natural gas bills for his Nashville estate in 2006.


###

­­­­­­­­­­
The Tennessee Center for Policy Research is an independent, nonprofit and nonpartisan research organization committed to achieving a freer, more prosperous Tennessee through free market policy solutions.
Paleocon Strikes!

Thursday, February 15, 2007

The "Evolving" Iraq War Hillary



Thanks to the Internet, talk radio and industrious 24-hour news cable outlets, Hillary can no longer get away with her "nuanced" views of issues. There is a record and it does not flatter the junior senator from New York.

Paleocon Strikes!

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Wasted!




Senator Barack Hussein Obama (D-IL) is definitely not ready for prime time. He is not managing his meteoric, though seemingly premature, rise to prominence well. The junior senator from Illinois is reportedly temperamental, irritable and, according to NY Times columnist Maureen "The Snake" Dowd, "a tad testy."
Obama's name won't be on Hillary's short list of potential running mates.
Paleocon Strikes!

Monday, February 05, 2007

Two Sides of the Same Coin

"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate, and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy."
-- Senator Joe Biden on Barack Obama

I wasn't even going to touch this but I'm stilll reeling over Senator Biden's idiotic statement. I have always thought of Delaware's senior senator as pompous and a blow-hard, but not necessarily clueless. I mean, is this 2007 or 1957?

Biden's statement reveals what should be no secret to anyone: condescending White liberals and Klansmen are the two sides of the same racist coin.

You may quote me on it.

Paleocon Strikes!

Two Americas

Carolina Journal Exclusive



Edwards Home County's Largest
The 28,200-square-foot home also Orange County's most valuable
By Don Carrington
January 26, 2007

RALEIGH — Presidential candidate John Edwards and his family recently moved into what county tax officials say is the most valuable home in Orange County. The house, which includes a recreational building attached to the main living quarters, also is probably the largest in the county.

Read more >>> http://carolinajournal.com/exclusives/display_exclusive.html?id=3848

For an aereal photo of Democrat presidential candidate John "Two Americas" Edward's sprawling 28,200 square foot estate, click here >>>
http://www.johnlocke.org/site-docs/images/edwardshouse-low.jpg

John Edwards, man of the people.

Paleocon Strikes!

Sunday, February 04, 2007

Heck of a Job, Welti!

From this weekend's Post-Bulletin.

Welti's 'glass' legislation met with sarcasm
Sat, Feb 3, 2007
By Matthew Stolle
The Post-Bulletin



Rep. Andy Welti says he has introduced legislation in an effort to deal with broken glass and glass bottles that dangerously litter some of the state's beaches and waterways.

House Republicans say his solution is to criminalize the possession of mustard bottles and cold cream.

The bill, introduced by the Plainview legislator earlier this week, has caused something of a political ruckus in St. Paul. It would prohibit all glass containers on beaches and watercraft, including inner tubes, kayaks and canoes. Violators would face a misdemeanor charge punishable by up to 90 days in jail, with each violation treated as a separate offense. A civil penalty not exceeding $20 also could be imposed.

House Republicans have weighed in with a fair share of sarcastic commentary over what they see as the "absurd" implications of the bill.

"This isn't littering. This is criminal possession of ketchup," said Andy Gildea, a staffer for the House Republican caucus.

GOP House Minority Leader Marty Seifert argued that a person could be tossed in jail for more than a year, all for having a six-pack of pop, a jar of pickles and bottles of mustard and ketchup aboard a boat. He based the length of the jail term on the idea that each glass bottle would constitute individual offenses.

"I'm not sure where he came up with it -- if he cut his foot on a bottle or what the deal is," Seifert said. "When you've considered the hundreds and hundreds of thousands of people in the state of Minnesota that enjoy boating, I'm not sure what the whole issue is here."

Welti, a second-term Democrat, said he wrote the bill after a constituent expressed concern about the quantity of broken glass cluttering the state's waterways and beaches. Welti declined to identify the person. He said the penalty portion of the bill was drawn up to be consistent with littering laws already on the books.




I don't write to my legislators as often as I should, but I could not let this one go. The following is the email I sent Rep. Andy Welti soon after I read the P-B story above.


Rep. Welti,

District 30B is now the laughing stock of Minnesota because of you. Thanks a lot.

I refer to this weekend's Post-Bulletin story "'Glass' Legislation met with sarcasm" on page 5B.

It is apparently much easier to grow a beard in order to LOOK mature than actually HAVE the maturity to address ONE constitutent's pet peeve with common sense rather than a draconian piece of half-baked legislation.

In President George W. Bush's ill-fated words to former FEMA director Michael Brown, Rep. Welti, you are doing "a heck of a job."

Emphasis on "heck."

Othelmo da Silva


Paleocon Strikes!

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

CBS News Chief: "Gender Bias to Blame for Couric Failure"

'Gender' Blamed for Katie Couric's Low Ratings

CBS News and Sports President Sean McManus says that gender bias may play a role in the disappointing ratings Katie Couric has been getting on "CBS Evening News.”

"I think it is a fact there are probably people, both men and women, who are perhaps uncomfortable having a woman anchor the news,” McManus told the media industry publication Broadcasting & Cable. "The way she is scrutinized, I think sometimes unfairly, quite frankly, I think a lot of that has to do with gender.”

McManus maintained that as a woman, Couric has to be concerned about "a lot of things the male anchor doesn’t have to worry about, like how she looks or what she is wearing.”






Comment: Perhaps if Ms. Couric and her CBS handlers were more concerned about the integrity and quality of their news reporting than the Today's former co-host's wardrobe and hair style, her ratings wouldn't be so poor.

I wonder if Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton struggles with the same challenges. But when she loses, liberals will be able to blame "gender bias" rather than the former First Lady's anti-American, repulsive far-left views for her electoral failure.

.

Sunday, January 28, 2007

Hillary Does Not Want to Risk "Inheriting" Iraq

Clinton: U.S. out of Iraq by January '09 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070128/ap_on_el_pr/clinton2008_13

By MIKE GLOVER, Associated Press Writer Sun Jan 28, 6:16 PM ET
DAVENPORT, Iowa -

Hillary Rodham Clinton said Sunday that President Bush should withdraw all U.S. troops from Iraq before he leaves office, asserting it would be "the height of irresponsibility" to pass the war along to the next commander in chief.

"This was his decision to go to war with an ill-conceived plan and an incompetently executed strategy," the Democratic senator from New York said her in initial presidential campaign swing through Iowa.

"We expect him to extricate our country from this before he leaves office" in January 2009, the former first lady said.


Hillary wants the presidency to be easy street: No challenges, just worship. We live in a dangerous world, however, not in her delusional self-serving fantasy.

9/11, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran and North Korea are not the first challenges America has faced. And they won't be the last.

The United States deserves a President who will face the challenges that are sure to come in the near future. The last thing America needs is a President whom the country's enemies know is unwilling to make the tough decisions and face existing challenges with determination and strength.

Friday, January 19, 2007

POISONOUS!

"The president knows that because the troops are in harm's way, that we won't cut off the resources. That's why he's moving so quickly to put them in harm's way."

-- Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) on ABC's "Good Morning America," January 19, 2007

So much for bipartisanship. The media won't call Pelosi on her poisonous and preposterous political attack on the President of the United States. But that's their predictably hateful and often irrational approach to everything and everyone with whom they disagree.

Thursday, January 04, 2007

No Big Deal

Über-liberal Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) was elected the first female House Speaker, which makes her third in line in succesion for the presidency of the United States of America. I am unimpressed.

Ms. Pelosi, who paints herself a wife, housewife, mother and grandmother is actually a millionaire several times over by "virtue" of marrying a millionaire. Her truculence, intransigence and rabid liberalism are renowned.

In a painfully orchestrated photo-op, several children surrounded her as she gaveled the new congressional session into order. She was doing it "for all American children," she said. Given the new democrat impetus to advance the abortion and embryonic and stem cell agendas, there won't be too many more of those children for Pelosi to parade in front of the TV cameras for her own self-aggrandizement.

Sunday, December 31, 2006

2007: The Best Is Yet to Come!


It's been an incredible 2006: Rewarding, challenging, encouraging, disappointing and full of blessing.

Politics is not my life. It is, at best, a diversion compared to what really matters.

My life is primarily my family, then my friends. As long as I have them, I have everything.

I look forward to communicating and collaborating with you in the New Year. There's much work to be done. In spite of recent setbacks in the political arena, like Ronald Reagan I believe that America's best years are ahead of her. His optimism and faith in the principles that make America great live in me. I pray they will blossom and grow in you in 2007 and beyond. I sign off with his words.


Whatever else history may say about me when I’m gone, I hope it will record that I appealed to your best hopes, not your worst fears; to your confidence rather than your doubts. My dream is that you will travel the road ahead with liberty’s lamp guiding your steps and opportunity’s arm steadying your way.

I know in my heart that man is good. That what is right will always eventually triumph. And there's purpose and worth to each and every life.

When the Lord calls me home, whenever that may be, I will leave with the greatest love for this country of ours and eternal optimism for its future. I now begin the journey that will lead me into the sunset of my life. I know that for America there will always be a bright dawn ahead.

I believe with all my heart that standing up for America means standing up for the God Who has so blessed our Land. We need God's Help to guide our Nation through stormy seas. But we can't expect Him to protect America in a crisis if we just leave Him over on the shelf in our day-to-day living.

We have to keep in mind we are a Nation under God, and if we ever forget that, we'll be just a nation under.

Sometimes when I'm faced with an unbeliever, an atheist, I'm tempted to invite him to the greatest gourmet dinner that one could ever serve, and when we finished eating that magnificent dinner, to ask him if he believes there's a cook.
Let us pray for the salvation of all of those who live in their totalitarian darkness -- pray that they will discover the joy of knowing God. But until they do, let us be aware that while they preach the supremacy of the state, declare its omnipotence over individual man, and predict its eventual domination of all peoples on the Earth, they are the locusts of evil in the modern world.

How can the leadership of the other side... open each session of their great convention with an injunction to the Lord, and end each session with a prayer to God, and still insist on denying that right to a child in a public school?

We will never compromise our Principles and Standards.
We will never give away our Freedom.
We will never abandon our Belief in God.

May God bless you and may He continue to bless the United States of America.

Friday, December 29, 2006

SADDAMNED

Saddām Husayn Aabdu-Al-majīd al-tikrītī:
April 28, 1937-December 30, 2006
Saddam Hussein was granted the due process he consistently and mercilessly denied millions of his own people. Justice has been served.

Monday, December 11, 2006

Good Riddance


During his farewell address at the Truman Presidential Museum and Library today, outgoing U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan reserved a few cowardly parting shots for President George W. Bush and the war on terror.

Prior to Annan, the U.N. was merely inept and irrelevant. He managed to add incompetence and corruption to the mix. It was only last year that the Independent Inquiry Committee, a U.N.- appointed panel created to investigate corruption in the oil-for-food program in Iraq before the war, rebuked the soon-to-be former U.N. Secretary-General for mismanaging the program and allowing his son Kojo to take advantage of his father's position for personal profit in it.