0bama: Coward and Liar (Not Necessarily in That Order)

Obama: Attacks on Susan Rice "outrageous"

"Let me say specifically about Susan Rice: She has done exemplary work. She has represented the U.S. and our interests in the U.N. with skill and professionalism and toughness and grace," said Mr. Obama. "If Senator McCain and Senator Graham and others want to go after somebody, they should go after me. And I'm happy to have that discussion with them. But for them to go after the U.N. ambassador? Who had nothing to do with Benghazi? And was simply making a presentation based on intelligence that she had received? To besmirch her reputation is outrageous."

Lay off the phony "war on women" nonsense, Barack. You are the one who sent U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice to be the public face of your Benghazi lies instead of doing it yourself. Rice lied on your behalf and under your direction, you coward. Four Americans died because of your cowardice, a fact you now try to hide behind your continued lies and fake outrage. 

0bama Lied, A Brave Navy SEAL Died

FATHER OF SEAL SLAIN IN BENGHAZI ATTACK DEMANDS ANSWERS AS GRISLY DETAILS EMERGE

“I knew that something was fishy. It just didn’t make sense that you’d have a long, drawn-out battle, and that no help would have been sent. I can’t say what their motivations are, and I’m not gonna speculate on that, but I do know that the Navy SEALs are incredibly honorable, and they have a code of ethics, a code of honor, and part of that code of honor is that they will never leave anyone behind…This was not necessary. I knew this could have happened, and my question in Washington, DC was, why didn’t this happen?”

~ Charles Woods, the father of slain Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods.

Meanwhile, in Coverup Land ...

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

"Ultimately, as commander in chief, I’m responsible, and I don’t shy away from that responsibility. My number one responsibility is to go after folks who did this and we’re going to make sure that we get them. I’ve got a pretty good track record doing that. 

~ Barack 0bama, Liar-in-Chief, as he covers his cowardly rear end with a helpful hand from his lamestream media sycophants.

Hail to the Hypocrite in Chief!

Self-Proclaimed Non-Divisive President Obama Calls Romney a Bullsh***er

As he left the Oval Office, Eric Bates, executive editor of 'Rolling Stone', told Obama that he had asked his six-year-old if there was anything she wanted him to say to the president and she had responded: 'Tell him: You can do it.' 

According to Bates, Obama grinned and said: 'You know, kids have good instincts. They look at the other guy and say, "Well, that's a bull***tter, I can tell."'

After four years of chronic unemployment, terminal incompetence, revolving bailouts, skyrocketing deficits, unsustainable debt, blame games, shameless cover ups and endless drone wars, we ALL know who the real bull***tter is.

Hillary's Benghazi Smirk

"No one wants to find out what happened more than I do."

~ Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reacting to the damning evidence that the State Department and the White House knew the seriousness of the situation in Benghazi in real time and failed to respond.





Is Hillary implying that she wants to find out what happened in Benghazi even more than Barack 0bama does? Hmmmm ...

BTW, didn't the State Department and the White House themselves "cherry pick" one version of the events that precipitated the Benghazi massacre over another? They deliberately went with the version that the attack stemmed from a protest that never took place as opposed to the version that it was a planned attack with definite terrorist ties.

Real Men Detest Barack Obama

Obama's Approval Hits All-Time Low of 39 Percent Among Men, Says Gallup

Tuesday, August 24, 2010
By Terence P. Jeffrey, Editor-in-Chief

(CNSNews.com) - President Barack Obama’s job approval rating among American men has fallen to a record low, hitting 39 percent in the week of Aug. 16-22, according to the Gallup Poll.

The week of Aug. 16-22 also marked the first time Obama’s average weekly approval rating dropped below 40 percent for either gender. His approval rating among American women was 46 percent for the week.

When Obama was inaugurated in January 2009, his job approval rating was 64 percent among men and 69 percent among women, according to Gallup. That was the highest his approval ever hit with men. [More]

Obama's MSNBC lamestream media cronies are disappointed in their master's oil spill address from the Oval Office last night.

Barack Obama's Environmental Incompetence Evident Even to Liberals

Obama's audience for health care: House Democrats

A group of health care professionals watched President Obama's speech yesterday at the White House; cable television networks also tuned in.

But neither the live crowd nor the television viewers appeared to be his primary audience. Instead, Obama seemed to speaking to wavering House Democrats -- particularly the more conservative Democrats -- who hold the keys to the "up-or-down" health care vote that the president demanded.

It won't be easy. For example, Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., told ABC's Good Morning America, he will oppose the president unless anti-abortion language is included in a final bill.

One of the arguments Obama presented in order to convince "wavering" Dems that they should pass his health care abomination bill is that "government can work." Notice he didn't say that it does, only that it "can." Sounds like even he admits it hasn't yet.

Dems are not "wavering." They are scared spitiless and won't fall on their swords for Obama.

Stupid Does as Stupid Is

With Absolute Power, Team Obama Grows Stupid

By Michael Barone
February 11, 2010

How could such smart people do so many stupid things? That question, or variations on it, is being asked in Washington and around the country about the Obama administration.

The same people who directed the campaign that defeated Hillary Clinton and routed John McCain, a campaign that raised far more money and attracted far more volunteers than any before it, have within a year come up with a legislative program that is crashing in ruins and that, to judge from recent polls, has left the Democratic Party weaker than I have seen it in almost 50 years of closely following politics.

The 2008 campaign was an impressive achievement. So, in a negative way, is the 2009 legislative program that has left the Democrats in such woeful shape in 2010. [More]

The Obamanoids came in declaring they were intellectually superior to every previous administration. What they have done, however, proves what many of us knew from the start: they were stupid to beging with. Their actions prove their stupidity regardless of what they said and continue to say.

Joe Biden: Barack Obama's "Effin' Retard" VP

Joe Biden update: Iraq One of Obama's "Great Achievements"

Who knew?

Thank goodness, Vice President Joe Biden went on CNN to chat with Larry King Wednesday night. So many think things are not going so well for the Democrat administration, as The Ticket chronicled here.


Many Americans recall the ex-Sen. Biden's Democratic primary plans to give in to Iraq's fractious factions and carve the country into three territories. And even more probably recall Biden's boss' plan to halt the Iraq war years ago. As long as it got started anyway without the permission of the then state senator. [More]

Just when Barack thought it was safe to let him out of the White House alone, Joe "Stand up, Chuck! Let 'em see you" Biden goes off script again.

Biden, who built a second career out of criticizing the Iraq war and the surge in troops that followed it, now wants to take credit for the relative stability in that Middle Eastern country and count it as one of Obama's nonexistent "great accomplishments."

Can't necessarily blame Biden on this one. Obama has had a year of failures. From health care to the economy to unemployment, Barack's many failings and inadequacies for the office of President of the United States of America are self-evident. What's left other than taking credit for a policy of the administration that he does nothing but vilify. Pathetic.

Here are some of Biden's shining moments. What a moron.




Stand Up, Chuck!:






Biden's "Iraq Plan":



Biden: "Break up Iraq!"

Birds of a Feather?

Osama bin Laden joins Al Gore in fighting manmade climate change

Former Vice President and Nobel Laureate Al Gore found an unlikely ally in his mission to save the world from the ravages of global warming – Osama bin Laden. In a new audiotape released by Al Jazeera, the terrorist warns that it is industrialized nations that are to blame and urged “drastic solutions" to solve the climate change crisis.

Bin Laden echoes many who believe the manmade climate change theory saying, "Speaking about climate change is not a matter of intellectual luxury - the phenomenon is an actual fact." The comments are akin to the oft-repeated ‘the science is settled’ argument.

It is the industrialized world and of course primarily the United States that is to blame for global warming. “All industrial nations, mainly the big ones, are responsible for the crisis of global warming," he says on the tape.

According to bin Laden, it is the rejection of the Kyoto Protocol by the United States that has caused global warming to impact the world. He said, "Bush the son, and the [US] Congress before him, rejected this agreement only to satisfy the big companies." [More]

Bin Laden's rhetoric is indistinguishable from Al Gore's and global warming alarmists of his ilk. Watch them scramble to set themselves apart from the Big Daddy of Terrorism.

Parenthetically, notice that bin Laden also does a "blame Bush" routine, which echoes Barack Obama's mantra whenever his ongoing failures and blatant inadequacies become evident.

Janet Napolitano is a Threat to National Security and MUST be FIRED ... IMMEDIATELY!

Official Bungling Led to Plane Attack


Examiner Editorial December 28, 2009

Nearly 300 passengers and crew members of Northwest Airlines flight 253 came within a heartbeat of being incinerated on Christmas Day because 23-year-old Nigerian Jihadist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab somehow smuggled explosives past sophisticated anti-terrorist security measures in Europe. That the passengers and crew members survived is because of Jasper Schuringa, a brave man from Amsterdam who prevented Abdulmutallab from detonating a bomb sewn into his underwear. The device was made of pentaerythritol tetranitrate, an explosive that has been around since before World War I. Three more factors in this near-tragedy deserve particular attention:

First, President Obama should demand the resignation of Secretary Janet Napolitano and fire her if she refuses to resign. It is clear from her comment that "the system worked" that Napolitano lacks the first clue about what is required to ensure safe commercial airline travel in an era defined by the war on terrorism. The system failed because an individual with known terrorist links successfully smuggled explosives on board a loaded commercial jet bound for the U.S. He did so by defeating screening measures in Amsterdam that mirror those used elsewhere in Europe and across the U.S. [More]

Obama will not fire Napolitano. That would be an admission that his choice for Homeland Security Secretary was yet another one of his miserable failures as president. She may be pressured to resign in order to take the focus away from Obama's own failure but he is not man enough to do it himself directly.

This is really offensive:

Security System Failed, Napolitano Acknowledges

By ERIC LIPTON and SCOTT SHANE
Published: December 28, 2009

WASHINGTON — The secretary of homeland security, Janet Napolitano, said Monday that the thwarted bombing of a Detroit -bound airliner represented a failure of the nation’s aviation security system, not the success she and other administration officials had portrayed in comments over the weekend.

Ms. Napolitano said Monday on NBC’S “Today” that her remark the day before — “the system has worked really very, very smoothly over the course of the past several days” — had been taken out of context. “Our system did not work in this instance,” she said. “No one is happy or satisfied with that. An extensive review is under way.”

As criticism mounted that security lapses had led to a brush with disaster on the Christmas holiday, President Obama ordered a review on Sunday of the two major planks of the aviation security system — watch lists and detection equipment at airport checkpoints. Some members of Congress urgently questioned why, more than eight years after the Sept. 11 attacks, security measures could not keep makeshift bombs off airliners.

The White House press office said early Monday that President Obama would make a statement within hours from the Kaneoho Marine Base in Hawaii, according to The Associated Press.

The family of the suspect, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, said Mondaythat they had been trying to locate him for weeks and had sought help from Nigerian and American officials. They said they would cooperate with an investigation.

His father, a prominent Nigerian banker and former government official, phoned the American Embassy in Abuja in October with a warning that his son had developed radical views, had disappeared and might have traveled to Yemen, American officials said, but the young man’s visa to enter the United States, which was good until June 2010, was not revoked.

Instead, the officials said Sunday, embassy officials marked his file for a full investigation should he reapply for a visa. And when the information was passed on to Washington, his name was added to 550,000 others with possible terrorist connections — but not to the no-fly list. That meant no flags were raised when he used cash to buy a ticket to the United States and boarded a plane, checking no bags.

So, Abdulmutallab boards a U.S.-bound airplane after paying CASH for the ticket and checking NO bags and "no flags were raised?" That spells "SYSTEM FAILURE" to me and anyone with a minimum of good judgment.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano is a danger to the security of America. When she said just yesterday that the system had not failed, it was nothing but propaganda that flew so batantly in the face of reality that she was forced to lie about what she had said the day before. This is more than simply "backtracking." Secretary Napolitano's previous assertion that she was "taken out of context" when she said that the system had not failed is plain pathological. And the American "mainstream" media will let the Homeland "Security" Secretary get away with it.

Nuff said!

"We Are China"

The post title above was the response of a good friend who lived in China as a missionary for a number of years when I sent him this link to a post from docstoc.com. Read it and weep for our country. It is a "PreK-6 Menu of Classroom Activities: President Obama's Address to Students Across America." There's also a Grades 7-12 version available here.

Both documents contain guided activities and questions to precede accompany and follow a taped address that will be broadcast to children across American on Tuesday, September 8, the first day of school for most children in the country.

At first I thought it was some kind of hoax. Surely in America a president would not take advantage of a captive audience of impressionable children to push his community organizing agenda, regardless of how "benign" it is. The last time I checked, the oath of office did not specify indocrination of young children as one of the duties of the President of the United States of America.

So, I called the office of Rochester School District Superintendent Romain Dallemand's office to find out what was really happening and the degree to which our district was going to participate in this "event." I received confirmation from Sheila that, yes, Obama's address would be available for viewing but that there was not directive from the district that the it be shown. That would strictly be an individual school building's decision.

I made a copy of the "menu" and asked one of the teachers at Washington Elementary, where my kids go to school, if she had heard anything about Tuesday's "presidential" address. She did not but informed me that there is going to be a staff meeting tomorrow and that it may come up then. I had confirmation that it will when I talked to Mr. Scripture, the new principal. He confirmed that he was going to mention it to staff tomorrow and that teachers were free to show it or not. It is going to be broadcast at noon Central Time, when most of the kids will be at either lunch or recess, but it could be streamed later as it becomes available on the Internet.

I informed him that if that is the case, I will pull my children out of school rather than have them exposed to socialist propaganda aided and abetted by their teachers in the form of a thinking guide. Here is a sample of the activities and questions that are supposed to take place during the speech:

• As the President speaks, teachers can ask students to write down key ideas or phrases that are important or personally meaningful. Students could use a note-taking graphic organizer such as a Cluster Web, or students could record their thoughts on sticky notes. Younger children can draw pictures and write as appropriate. As students listen to the speech, they could think about the following:

What is the President trying to tell me?

What is the President asking me to do?

What new ideas and actions is the President challenging me to think about?

• Students can record important parts of the speech where the President is asking them to do something. Students might think about: What specific job is he asking me to do? Is he asking anything of anyone else? Teachers? Principals? Parents? The American people? ...

Welcome to AmeriKa! The very idea that elementary school teachers are supposed to follow a pre-ordained guide to direct students in the proper way to understand and apply the Supreme Leader's speech is repulsive to me. If you are so inclined, ask your children's teachers about this and keep them at home if the school is participating in this blatant brainwashing of young minds.

My question is, why is there a script to guide the way kids think and understand Obama's speech, whatever he says? Does this seem creepy and totalitarian to anyone else?

I am currently reading "1984" and have come to realize that it is no longer fiction. Indoctrination and groupthink are here in our schools and directed at our children.

This is scarily un-American. Do people understand the implications of having children indocrinated in school? Where is the critical thinking, the debate, the rebuttal? My children will NOT be exposed to Barack Obama's mind control mambo jambo. His ideas and educational philosophy are anathema to the founding of America. My children and yours deserve better than to be brainwashed by our president's socialist drivel.

On The Run

Liberals are on the run. They feel Obama has thrown them under the bus much in the same way he did to his grandmother and the Reverend Jeremiah Wright.

Liberals should now and forever be distrustful of Obama. He’s proven himself to be the typical politician who says conflicting things with feigned conviction to whatever audience he happens to be addressing at the time. Think First District Congressman Tim Walz and State Representative Andy Welti.

Just last week, Obama was saying that the public option was, well ... optional. The next day, Kathleen Sebelius, his Health and Human Services Secretary, tells the Sunday shows that the public option is not an essential element of Obamacare. They even floated the idea of so-called health care co-ops, remember?

None of this was lost on rank-and-file liberals. They had been taking it on the chin for weeks from Sarah Palin on Facebook to grandma and grandpa at town hall meetings across the country. Now, the One on Whom They Had Placed Their Hope and Change seemed to be equivocating on the key element of the socialization of health care in America. Such egregious betrayal so soon after Obama’s Immaculation!

Maybe Obama is the one at whom they are really incensed, not Independents, Republicans and principled Democrats who oppose socialized health care, its death panels and public options. Their rage, however misplaced is palpable, particularly among the President’s Astroturf agents

How Low Will It Go?

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows that 29% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Thirty-seven percent (37%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -8 (see trends).

Heck of a job, Barack!

Obama to Dissenters: "Shut Up and Get Out of My Way!"

How very American. This is one of those occasions when, as President, Barack Obama should draw more from his experiences as a constitutional law professor than as a community organizer. He is behaving like the rabble-rouser-in-chief, not the commander-in-chief here.

Socialism Has A Face

Obama Nominates Bench Legislator to Supreme Court

This clip is all over the 'Net. Federal Appeals Court judge Sonia Sotomayor, Barack Obama's pick to replace Supreme Court Justice David Souter, is caught on tape in a not-so-Freudian slip saying that the appeals court "is where policy is made." Scary but not at all out of "character" when you consider that Sotomayor, who reportedly has a hight opinion of herself, has said that she "would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life." If that is truly the case then only "wise Latina women" with the "richness" of Sotomayor's experience should be named to judgeships from now on. Such arrogance and prejudice would not be tolerated in "a white male who hasn't lived that life."

Earlier this month, Bush White House strategist Karl Rove gave a prophetic interview to Fox News regarding the possibility of Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court:

Rove is right once again when he states that "you can't be someone who strictly applies the law and somebody who is going to to make their determinations based on your personal feelings towards the defendant or the plaintiff in your attempt to sort of right a wrong that the law might not allow you to do."

Judicial Confirmation Network court counsel Wendy E. Long issued the following statement regarding Sotomayor's nomination: "Judge Sotomayor is a liberal judicial activist of the first order who thinks her own personal political agenda is more important that the law as written. "She thinks that judges should dictate policy, and that one's sex, race and ethnicity ought to affect the decisions one renders from the bench."

Long

Judges are not elected officials. They do not make policy, they interpret law. As now Supreme Court Justice John G. Roberts famously said during his 2005 confirmation hearing,

"Mr. Chairman, I come before the committee with no agenda. I have no platform. Judges are not politicians who can promise to do certain things in exchange for votes. I have no agenda but I do have a commitment. If I am confirmed, I will confront every case with an open mind. I will fully and fairly analyze the legal arguments that are presented. I will be open to the considered views of my colleagues on the bench. And I will decide every case based on the record, according to the rule of law, without fear or favor, to the best of my ability. And I will remember that it's my job to call balls and strikes and not pitch or bat."

Roberts

Cheney Destroys Obama on Terror

Chicken Feed: Obama's $100 Million "Proposed" Budget Cuts

Could it be? Reporters asking tough questions of the Obama Administration Propaganda Minister Robert Gibbs? Say it ain't so!



Update: A good businessman friend tells me that $100 million is 0.0029% of the federal budget. Heck of a job, Obama!