Maybe if she weren't so ... well ... angry.

Michelle Obama Says People Have Inaccurately Cast Her As An "Angry Black Woman"

(AP) (AP/CBS News) WASHINGTON -- First lady Michelle Obama is challenging assertions she's forcefully imposed her will on White House aides and says people have inaccurately tried to portray her as "some kind of angry black woman."

Mrs. Obama tells CBS News she hasn't read New York Times reporter Jodi Kantor's new book that characterizes her as a behind-the-scenes force in the Executive Mansion, whose strong views often draw her into conflict with President Barack Obama's top advisers.

It's damage control time and a willing sycophant corporate media is eager to give Angry Black Woman in Chief Michelle Obama a venue for rebuttal of every damning information about her angry and confrontational behavior revealed in Kantor's book "The Obamas."

Lauer vs. Santelli

Today's Lauer is in the tank for Obama. Period. Is that what the American media have been reduced to? Presidential apologists?

Liberal Democratic Corruption: Follow the Blagojevich Stench Wherever It May Lead, Even If It Reaches the "Office of the President-Elect"

“Scarborough Rips MSM: In Wasilla Instead of Investigating Obama-Blago Connection” - video available here.

Excerpts:

JOE SCARBOROUGH: How rich is it that we sit around and say “we don’t know, we have to wait until Obama tells us. We don’t know what these connections, we don’t know whether he really ran the 2002 [Blago] campaign or not”? Again, I will guarantee you, if Sarah Palin had run the most corrupt—if Sarah Palin had run Ted Stevens’s campaign in 2002, and somebody had bragged about it in the New Yorker, the press would have savaged her. But we sit here now, it’s almost Christmas, and we don’t know the truth about it. We don’t know the truth about any of this, because we haven’t done the investigative work . . . I’m convicting the press because they didn’t investigate this past summer, when they were sending all those people to Wasilla, a town of 9,000, they should have been going to Chicagoland.

MIKA BRZEZINSKI: I think that’s really fair.

SCARBOROUGH: The press never covered --

JOHN HARWOOD: To cover Blagojevich?

SCARBOROUGH: To look at the background of a candidate who had only been in national politics for one year before he decided to run for president of the United States, and was born from the most corrupt political city in America. Do you not think, do we not think, that warranted an investigation? Not to suggest he did anything wrong, but to see what his background was?

HARWOOD: Of course. There was coverage of his background—Ryan Lizza’s piece.

SCARBOROUGH: OK, then tell me this—yeah, Lizza’s the only one that wrote about it and he got kicked off the campaign plane. So here’s my question for you: if we know so much about this, answer this question. Did Barack Obama, was Barack Obama intimately involved in Blagojevich’s 2002 campaign?

Why are some in the MMM (Moribund Mainstream Media) so interested in the Obamafraud's past associations now that the Blagojevich scandal is in full throttle? Why are they all of a sudden surprised that they themselves failed to scrutinize their own liberal god when they had the chance? Will they do the right thing and ask the hard questions and follow the corruption wherever it may lead? Given their past record, I highly doubt it. As far as I am concerned, the MMM is an accessory to the Democratic Party corruption.

Finally: Moribund Mainstream Media Ask "Obama Who?"

If Barack Obama is still an "unknown" it's because people like Charlie Rose and Tom Brokaw have failed miserably in their journalistic duty to inform the American people about the political ideology of the president-elect in the months before the November election.

Will the likes of Rose and Brokaw in the Moribund Mainstream Media take responsibility for their dereliction of duty when disaster befalls the American culture, society and economy or chaos inflicts the international scene? I rather doubt it.

O, well, they can always blame George W. Bush, I suppose.